Author Archives | Emily Goodykoontz

Eugene City Council extends pre-game tailgating hours at Autzen Stadium

On July 9, the Eugene City Council voted in a unanimous decision to extend legal tailgating hours at Autzen Stadium before University of Oregon football games.

Traditionally, Oregon football fans park in lots near Autzen Stadium before games, where they can socialize and legally drink alcohol for several hours. The changes to city code raise the total tailgating time from four to six hours and will be in effect this fall. Tailgating will not begin before 7 a.m. on game days.

Due to some community concern on the effect of the extended hours for drinking, Councilor Jennifer Yeh proposed an amendment before the final vote.

It’s the irresponsible fans unfortunately we have to plan for,” said Yeh.

The council unanimously approved the amendment, causing the ordinance to sunset after 1 year, when it will be reviewed and re-approved or discarded by the council. UO is required to give the council four sets of information by April 2019. These include a comparison of traffic and alcohol-related arrests to previous tailgating seasons, a coordinated parking plan between UO and Eugene that ensures emergency vehicle access and reduces negative impacts, an Auzten Stadium entry and re-entry policy that addresses problematic drinking and a plan for enforcing underage drinking laws.

According to the original proposal, UO offered to provide extra security and review the effects of the extended hours after each football season.

The proposal was brought to the council by UO in June. On June 18, the city held a public hearing on the matter.

UO Deputy Athletic Director Eric Roedl told the council that the proposal aims to improve the game experience for the 60 percent of fans who drive from all over Oregon to attend games

“What we’re doing through this proposal is creating an opportunity for them to spend more time with friends, with family at Autzen and experiencing that football game day which for many is an experience that really extends beyond the game itself,” he said.

He also said the extended hours could improve congestion from game traffic on the I-5 corridor and near Autzen Stadium. According to Roedl, all other Pac-12 and Power Five schools have five or more hours of tailgating except the University of California. At Oregon State, tailgating begins at 7 a.m., regardless of kickoff time, he said.

In June, City Councilor Alan Zelenka said the biggest concern with the proposal he’d heard from others was the possible effects of extended alcohol drinking hours.

“More hours mean more drunk people,” he said.

But UOPD Police Chief Matt Carmichael spoke in support of the amendment.

“We average about 55,000 fans per game, and yet we probably experience 30 to 33 ejections on average,” he said. “Quite frankly not all of those are alcohol related. So, the reality is UO fans come and have a great time and there’s a very small percentage of those that we have issues with related to alcohol.”

At the July meeting, Yeh said many community members near Autzen Stadium still had concerns.

“Chief Carmichael said that increasing the number of hours would not increase drinking because people would drink the same amount, just over a longer period of time, and I think that’s probably true for many responsible drinkers,” said Yeh. “It’s not the responsible drinkers I think we are worried about in this scenario. It’s not the responsible drinkers who cause problems at the stadium. They don’t park and block streets in driveways, they don’t throw trash in yards as they’re leaving to go home from the game, they don’t give underaged people alcohol.”

But Councilor Mike Clark said the opportunity will create a destination event that lightens traffic and benefits the community.

“Based on what I’ve heard from public safety professionals, this creates both a safer atmosphere and one that involves more and more economic development in our community,” he said. “It seems like a good idea to me.”

The post Eugene City Council extends pre-game tailgating hours at Autzen Stadium appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on Eugene City Council extends pre-game tailgating hours at Autzen Stadium

New UO club explores what it means to be American

University of Oregon senior Rachel Alm doesn’t know what it means to be American, but she’s starting a campus-wide conversation seeking an answer to the question.

Alm’s family emigrated from Japan to Hawaii five generations ago. Growing up in her Hawaiian community, Alm was considered to be Hapa — a Hawaiian word identifying people of mixed-race heritage, particularly of Asian or Pacific Islander descent.

It was a comfortable term for a young woman straddling the identities of her Japanese and Scandinavian descent while growing up as an American and a Hawaiian resident, she said.

But when Alm moved to Eugene, a much more homogeneous white community than her last, she found that her Japanese heritage became the quality identifying her to many people.

“When I came to Oregon, I was like ‘Wow, I am suddenly this Asian girl,’ and that was really weird for me because growing up, I was mixed-race — a Hapa kid in Hawaii,” said Alm.

Her complex and rich heritage and identity was reduced by strangers— and it wasn’t even an accurate depiction, she said.

“When I came here, I realized I didn’t feel like I fit in and I didn’t know that much about American continental culture,” said Alm. “I felt very privileged to have been raised in Hawaii but then was struggling to figure out what it means to be American.”

She realizes this might be a common experience for U.S. immigrants and their descendants.

“How do I understand where I fit into American as a mixed-race kid? There’s going be plenty more people like me, so we need to figure this out,” she said.

Alm founded Define American UO last fall, a local chapter of a national nonprofit founded by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist and undocumented immigrant Jose Antonio Vargas. Define American explores how cultural narratives and storytelling influence ideas about immigration and identity. As coordinator of a hyper-local campus chapter, Alm is laying the foundation for a conversation to unfold.

Vargas visited campus fall term as the UO Wayne Morse Center for Law and Politics Chair; the organization’s current theme of inquiry is “borders, migration and belonging.”

When Alm met Vargas during a lunch meeting with Wayne Morse scholars, he suggested that she could bring a locally-focused chapter of Define American to UO.

“I think we have to figure out a sense of collective identity beyond just our segmented groups. That’s what I’m kind of hoping we can do, is be a place for these difficult conversations that are coming up because we are becoming more diverse,” said Alm. “I think that diversity will be beautiful once we know how to work through differences and what happens when a homogenous community breaks down and is suddenly interacting with people that it never had to before. “

Alm said that Define American UO doesn’t have any political affiliation; It welcomes all students interested in participating in conversations about American identity and immigration. The group is working to challenge negative stereotypes about immigration in partnership with other similar organizations like No Lost Generation UO, a student group that advocates for refugees.

Momo Wilms-Crowe, director of No Lost Generation UO and a Define American UO member, said that while UO can be an open community, she does see ideas and stereotypes harmful to local immigrant communities.

“It’s not something that’s just unique to our campus; it’s a national conversation and I think the university is a microcosm for that,” said Wilms-Crowe.

She said Define American is looking for ways to uplift and support immigrant voices while challenging harmful ideas about the “good immigrant and bad immigrant dichotomy.”

“The biggest way that these harmful narratives get spread is just by people who don’t have that personal connection. With refugees, there’s just so much misconception,” said Wilms-Crowe.

Alm and Wilms-Crowe hope to reframe how people talk about immigrants in a way that is accurate and recognizes how they benefit American communities.

“I hope that in the future Define American can find a way to really incorporate the voices of immigrants themselves,” said Wilms-Crowe.

Vargas’ visit  inspired more than one student; Mariko Plescia, a graduate employee in Romance Languages, taught a class with Vargas fall term that focused on empowering immigrants, listening to their experiences and challenging narratives around how they are portrayed in the media. Plescia said that immigrants are underrepresented in media and are often portrayed as criminals.

“This change has to come out of listening, and out of listening in particular to people who have gone through the experience of immigration,” she said.

On June 12, Define American UO will hold its second showing of Chinese artist and activist Ai Weiwei’s film “Human Flow,” which documents current mass migrations around the globe. The screening will take place in the Knight Law Center, room 184 at 6:30 p.m. A first screening was held at the Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art last Thursday.

The screenings are the first public events held by Define American UO and are funded in partnership with the Wayne Morse Center, said Plescia.

After the screening, Plescia will host a community discussion. She said the film is a good starting point to build common ground and frame a conversation about migration that includes a wide variety of perspectives.

Define American UO is just beginning to build a presence on campus. Alm said she hopes the screenings will draw interest for student participation in the fall.

“We’re here to learn. We don’t know the right answers,” said Alm. “That’s why we want to keep talking — we think we’ll maybe find some answers along the way.”

The post New UO club explores what it means to be American appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on New UO club explores what it means to be American

“Not in our town”: Eugene community pushes back against recent hate crime

When southwest Eugene residents awoke Wednesday morning, April 25, they found their neighborhood vandalized with swastikas and symbols of white supremacy.

Overnight, the hateful messages were spray-painted across sidewalks, signs, trees and garbage cans. The vandalism reached the south edge of Cesar E. Chavez Elementary School, where the words “white power” were scrawled across a sidewalk. The day before, vandals also defaced signs in residents’ yards with swastikas.

On April 25, the city and the Eugene Police received multiple calls reporting the graffiti near West 18th Avenue and Chambers Street. Because the vandalism was motivated by and contained messages of hate, the city considers it a hate crime.

Vandals left messages of white power on city property on April 25. Eugene police encourage anyone who sees these symbols to report it immediately. The number 1488 is a two-part symbol for white supremacy. The 88 stands for “Heil Hitler,” and the 14 invokes the 14-word slogan. (courtesy photo/Community Alliance of Lane County)

Reports of hate incidents and crimes like the vandalism in Eugene shot up nearly 70 percent last year, according to the city’s 2017 Hate and Bias Report. That’s 139 in 2017 versus 82 in 2016. But community members aren’t standing by while their neighborhoods are vandalized. Residents are hitting the streets in targeted responses to the hate crimes: the Stop Hate Campaign.

“We have to show the people that are expressing this hate that it’s not acceptable,” said Stop Hate volunteer Do Mi Stauber.

Stop Hate is a community network of volunteers organized by the nonprofit Community Alliance of Lane County (CALC) that coordinates responses to local hate activity.

Stauber and about 20 other volunteers spent Saturday, April 28, in a door-to-door leafleting campaign in the vandalized neighborhoods. The group asked local businesses to post bright red signs in their windows that read “Hate Free Zone,” and spoke with neighborhood residents about the hate crime, providing flyers with law enforcement and city phone numbers.

Volunteers gathered in restaurant Ankgor Wat before their door-to-door leafleting campaign to give neighborhood residents information on reporting hate crimes. (Emily Goodykoontz/Daily Emerald)

“We do this to send a message to the broader community that we don’t want any hate anywhere in Lane County. The message is ‘not in our town,’” said Michael Carrigan, co-director of programs at CALC.

Stop Hate coordinates with CALC’s Back to Back: Allies for Human Dignity program, which cultivates safety and respect in communities.

“We’re showing these folks that we have their backs. Together, we will take these people on,” Carrigan said.

Brittany Judson, coordinator for Back to Back, worries incidents like this could escalate, especially because the vandalism was so widespread.

“I don’t think graffiti incidents like this should be taken lightly. It’s planned. It’s coordinated,” said Judson. “It’s a big hit to do that much graffiti on city property and to do it in the middle of the night, too.”

That’s why, she says, it’s so important to make a strong community stand.

“It’s serious. It could turn into something else and we don’t want it to, so we are making people aware and we are empowering people to utilize their resources, and to do something in the moment,” Judson said.

Brittany Judson is the coordinator for the Back to Back program and organizes the Stop Hate Campaign. (Emily Goodykoontz/Daily Emerald)

CALC works with the city and EPD to encourage reporting of hate incidents and hate crimes. EPD spokeswoman Melinda McLaughlin said the Stop Hate Campaign fosters supportive community connections and increases awareness of reporting options.

EPD hasn’t arrested anyone for the April 25 vandalism, and police don’t know if it was one person or a group, said McLaughlin.

The Register-Guard reported that the vandalism occurred the day after City Council voted to rename the community center at Westmoreland City Park as the Dr. Edwin L. Coleman, Sr. Community Center. Coleman was a tenured University of Oregon professor who taught ethnic studies, worked with the NAACP and was a leader for racial and social justice.

However, McLaughlin said the community center itself wasn’t tagged.

“There is no evidence at this point to connect the case to the renaming,” she said.

Hate incidents hit every part of the city

The surge of hate incident reports in Eugene is in line with national increases, according to Jennifer Lleras Van Der Van Haeghen, manager of the city’s Human Rights and Neighborhood Involvement Office.

But hate incidents are underreported., she said. The Department of Justice estimated only one-third are reported nationally.

“Every neighborhood of our community experiences some type of hate crime or hate incident,” said Van Der Haeghen.

A hate crime is any criminal activity motivated by hate; a hate incident is any non-criminal activity motivated by hate, she said. Incidents are usually protected as free speech but are discriminatory and cause fear or concern in the community, Van Der Haeghen said.

Her office tracks any hate-related incidents or crimes in a coordinated effort with EPD, Eugene Public Works and organizations like CALC and the NAACP. Together, they are trying to paint an accurate picture about what people are experiencing in Eugene and hate graffiti trends, said Van Der Haeghen.

There are 18 active hate groups in Oregon, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Last year EPD increased its efforts to report hate graffiti — officers now document it whenever they find it. This could be one factor in the increase of reports, McLaughlin said.

Residents should report any hate activity or speech they experience or see — even if it’s not a crime — to the Human Rights and Neighborhood Involvement Office, said Van Der Haeghen.

“It’s really important to track the incidents that occur in our communities that are the undercurrent — or the potential undercurrent — of things that may someday bubble up to a hate crime and make room for hate crimes in our community,” Van Der Haeghen said.

Community Alliance of Lane County coordinators Brittany Judson (left) and Michael Carrigan (right) alert neighbors in south Eugene to a hate incident on February 10. (Emily Goodykoontz/Daily Emerald)

In February, the Stop Hate Campaign responded to another reported hate incident in the South Eugene neighborhood near East Amazon Drive and 35th Avenue. Pairs of volunteers went door to door, handing out the flyers and warning residents that a truck was seen dragging a doll representing a person of color behind it.

“People are outraged. they don’t like it. They don’t want to think that could happen in Eugene. It happens all the time. So, it’s important to get out and let the neighbors know,” said Jay Moseley, 40-year Eugene resident and longtime CALC volunteer. Moseley has participated in 10 Stop Hate Campaigns in the last few years, including the two this year.

CALC volunteers aren’t the only ones challenging hate in Eugene communities.

Van Der Haeghen said the city is working with 23 different neighborhood associations in Eugene to make the communities feel more welcoming and safe. As a part of that effort, in some areas residents posting neighborhood welcome signs in their yards, written in multiple languages. At least two were defaced with swastikas.

Signs in neighborhood yards were defaced with swastikas on April 24. (courtesy photo/Community Alliance of Lane County)

“It’s just really disheartening to see that they took a proactive step and then we’re seeing graffiti pretty quickly as a result,” said Van Der Haeghen.

But the Stop Hate campaigners are countering the hate with messages of inclusiveness, respect and community.

“I think that when more people put these Stop Hate signs up and more people call and report, the message somehow gets out there,” said Moseley. “It kind of seeps into the fabric of the community.”

 

 

How to report a hate crime or incident:

  • If you witness or experience a hate crime, call 9-1-1
  • Stop Hate encourages people to yell “I’m calling 9-1-1”
  • If you see any hate activity like racist slurs, neo-nazi vandalism, or white supremacists
    • Report it to law enforcement or the city
    • Get a license plate number, location, physical descriptions or photos
    • People who are reporting incidents can remain anonymous
  • Eugene Police Department: 541-682-5111
  • Springfield Police: 541-762-3714
  • Lane County Sheriff: 541-682-4150
  • Eugene Human Rights and Neighborhood Involvement Office: 541-682-5619
  • Or report online at: eugene-or.gov/ReporteHate

Correction: In a previous version of this article, a last name was spelled Staber. It has been changed to the correct spelling of Stauber.  

The post “Not in our town”: Eugene community pushes back against recent hate crime appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on “Not in our town”: Eugene community pushes back against recent hate crime

An agent of change: Grad student Ali Lau fights for equity and inclusion for underrepresented students in the College of Design

The Emerald asked the University of Oregon community to nominate outstanding women to celebrate as part of Women’s History Month. Our newsroom chose one woman to honor from a pool of nominees who are making a significant impact at UO with their integrity, courage, innovation, creativity, spirit, smarts, leadership, hard work and ambition.

Ali Lau was nominated four separate times for speaking out on issues of inequity, bias and race at UO. Read about her work below, and find profiles of the other nominees here.

High above the coruscating waters of the Pacific Ocean, the plane curved northward, carrying Alexandra Lau home. As the shores of Honolulu tilted into view and the lush green archipelago of the Hawaiian islands stretched across the horizon, Lau began to cry. Her chest ached.

It was the first moment in which she began to understand the depth of her intrinsic connection to her home and land as a Native Hawaiian woman.

She was returning for the first time since leaving her all-Native Hawaiian private preparatory high school to attend Hampshire College in Massachusetts.

Throughout childhood she dreamed of leaving Hawai’i behind to live in New York. But when she finally left the cocoon of her warm island home, she was struck with the cold reality of life as one of the most underrepresented peoples in the United States.

“I grew up not knowing I was a minority,” Lau said. “I’m Hawaiian, Chinese, Filipina, Portuguese, Russian, Welsh and Native American — I’m very mixed, but what I identify as is native Hawaiian, and it took a long time for me to even really realize what that meant.”

At Hampshire, she struggled to find any faculty to take her seriously. She watched her rich, white friends navigate the academic system with ease.

For someone coming all the way from Hawai’i from a fairly middle-low income family, it was really hard for me to fit into that,” Lau said. “I had a friend whose dad was donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to the school, and I saw him excel.”

But it would take Lau years to understand and express what she was experiencing.

She transferred to St. Joseph’s College in Brooklyn, where the diverse atmosphere of New York City welcomed her. Lau graduated in 2010 with a bachelors in mathematics. Now a 29-year-old graduate student at the University of Oregon in her final year, Lau is earning two  master’s degrees from the College of Design, one in architecture and the other in community and regional planning.

“Everything I do is based on my identity of being native Hawaiian,” Lau said. “There’s been a huge movement in Hawaiian renaissance for us to remember as a people who we are and what the power is in that.”

American society stigmatizes Native Hawaiians as “fat and lazy,” and sometimes Native Hawaiians internalize these stereotypes about themselves, said Lau. But the last 30 years have seen a resurgence and reclamation of cultural heritage. She intends to use her technical architecture and planning skills with an indigenous lens to push the Honolulu community toward sustainability.

It wasn’t until she moved to Eugene that her experience of being a minority crystallized.

“Being here brought up a lot of doubt for me,” Lau said. “Doubt that I was capable to be here and to do this, doubt that I would be able to finish, doubt that I even was a valuable citizen.”

She felt it in everyday moments, like being ignored during a visit to the dentist. She was isolated as a woman of color in her academic department. On top of the stress of grad school, she was usually the only person of color in her classrooms. During discussions, other students talked over her, and she found her ideas dismissed and overlooked by faculty.

“It’s below the radar. And if you aren’t looking for it, and if you don’t have the language for it, you don’t really know it’s happening. But it is still happening to you,” Lau said. “So many of these little experiences — whether you know they’re happening or not — they are having an effect on you.”

Architecture and planning graduate student Ali Lau explains the importance of bringing culture to a community during her final presentation for the 2018 winter term. (Phillip Quinn/Emerald)

Once she found a way to articulate the problems she and her peers were facing, Lau took the fight for equity to the top of the School of Planning, Public Policy and Management. She met Rachel Mallinga, one of the only other women of color in the department, and the two began to work together.

“Ali is just one woman in the long history of women of color who’ve spoken up and done the hard work to push for change,” Mallinga, an alum of the nonprofit management program, said.

In 2015, Mallinga founded the Peer Exchange as a safe space for underrepresented students in PPPM to convene, share their experiences and support each other. Lau was inspired to voice her concerns about a lack of equity in the department and find a constructive way to create change from within.

After a group of students sent official letters to the PPPM department with requests for equity action and saw little change, Lau knew they needed a concrete framework to hold the department accountable.  The two women spent eight months interviewing students and compiling an official report that evaluated the department’s cultural competency from a student perspective and recommended specific changes to curriculums, classrooms and faculty.

“This ‘Cultural Competency Report’ provides key elements to establishing a culture of equity, diversity, and inclusion,” Mallinga and Lau wrote in its intro.

When Mallinga graduated last year, Lau took over as a facilitator of the Peer Exchange.

Because of Mallinga and Lau’s vocal leadership of the Peer Exchange and the official letters sent to the department head, Rich Margerum, the PPPM department formed an Equity Initiative of faculty and students to address the concerns.

“I think there’s a little bit of complacency that, oh, we’re all liberal-minded, open minded, and so forth, everything’s going fine — without really understanding where those perspectives are coming from,” Margerum said.

The initiative has used this report and hosted listening sessions to hear the perspectives of underrepresented students. For a graduate department that specializes in shaping cities and societies with policy, it’s essential to understand how applicable and integral these issues are and include them as a central part of the curriculum, according to Lau.

“You can count on your fingers how many students of color there are. You know that it’s small,” Lau said about PPPM.

Graduate school is already a stressful environment. Add the stress of being an underrepresented student and it becomes even worse, Lau said.

“When you’re one of a few women of color in a department, you’re dealing with a really different experience, and graduate school can be an unwelcoming environment” Mallinga said. “Just having that support — how to navigate around microaggressions is really important.”

Lau also sees Mallinga as a leader for social change. “Until I started working with her, one, I thought I was going crazy, and two, I just had no idea that you could actually do something about it,” Lau said.

Those around Lau in the department and in her life, like her partner and fellow PPPM student, Oliver Gaskell, consistently emphasized Lau’s ability as an agent for change on both structural and personal levels, despite all the other work she has to do.

Gaskell said that Lau also aims to connect with the international students in the graduate program who are sometimes left on their own. He said she made it one of her goals last term to meet with international students and hear about their experiences.

Margerum described her as brave for confronting implicit bias within classrooms and holding the department accountable.

“She’s just done a really terrific job of being critical of things that fall short but also being very constructive and presenting in a way that faculty come away with a real positive, energized feeling about what they need to do and being convinced this is a priority,” Margerum said about Lau’s work.

Lau and Mallinga aren’t the only students who’ve felt burdened by a culture of whiteness at UO.

“Eugene’s pretty ethnically homogeneous, so when you first move here you can feel really othered to a whole different extent than probably where you’re moving from,” Jaclyn Kellon, a Ph.D candidate in chemistry and the president and founder of student support group Community for Minorities in STEM, said.

Kellon reached out to Lau last summer when starting a program for grad students called Creating Connections. “Our goal is to create a larger social network and social support system that can help students from underrepresented minority populations connect and feel a sense of belonging at the university,” Kellon said.

Lau is in her last six of months of school and has moved her focus from the PPPM’s Equity Initiative to helping Kellon kickstart the broader program.

She wants to leave behind a growing community and support system for future graduate students of color.

M hired two new tenure-track faculty, for positions called Engaging Diverse Communities. Both start next fall and are Latino men.

But the department still has a long way to go and things are moving slowly, according to Lau.

“People who are in positions of power, namely white, cisgendered men and women should listen to women of color,” Mallinga said. “Throughout history we’ve spoken our truths and this is what Ali has done. She’s going to be an agent of change.”

The post An agent of change: Grad student Ali Lau fights for equity and inclusion for underrepresented students in the College of Design appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on An agent of change: Grad student Ali Lau fights for equity and inclusion for underrepresented students in the College of Design

An agent of change: Grad student Ali Lau fights for equity and inclusion for underrepresented students in the College of Design

The Emerald asked the University of Oregon community to nominate outstanding women to celebrate as part of Women’s History Month. Our newsroom chose one woman to honor from a pool of nominees who are making a significant impact at UO with their integrity, courage, innovation, creativity, spirit, smarts, leadership, hard work and ambition.

Ali Lau was nominated four separate times for speaking out on issues of inequity, bias and race at UO. Read about her work below, and find profiles of the other nominees here.

High above the coruscating waters of the Pacific Ocean, the plane curved northward, carrying Alexandra Lau home. As the shores of Honolulu tilted into view and the lush green archipelago of the Hawaiian islands stretched across the horizon, Lau began to cry. Her chest ached.

It was the first moment in which she began to understand the depth of her intrinsic connection to her home and land as a Native Hawaiian woman.

She was returning for the first time since leaving her all-Native Hawaiian private preparatory high school to attend Hampshire College in Massachusetts.

Throughout childhood she dreamed of leaving Hawai’i behind to live in New York. But when she finally left the cocoon of her warm island home, she was struck with the cold reality of life as one of the most underrepresented peoples in the United States.

“I grew up not knowing I was a minority,” Lau said. “I’m Hawaiian, Chinese, Filipina, Portuguese, Russian, Welsh and Native American — I’m very mixed, but what I identify as is native Hawaiian, and it took a long time for me to even really realize what that meant.”

At Hampshire, she struggled to find any faculty to take her seriously. She watched her rich, white friends navigate the academic system with ease.

For someone coming all the way from Hawai’i from a fairly middle-low income family, it was really hard for me to fit into that,” Lau said. “I had a friend whose dad was donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to the school, and I saw him excel.”

But it would take Lau years to understand and express what she was experiencing.

She transferred to St. Joseph’s College in Brooklyn, where the diverse atmosphere of New York City welcomed her. Lau graduated in 2010 with a bachelors in mathematics. Now a 29-year-old graduate student at the University of Oregon in her final year, Lau is earning two  master’s degrees from the College of Design, one in architecture and the other in community and regional planning.

“Everything I do is based on my identity of being native Hawaiian,” Lau said. “There’s been a huge movement in Hawaiian renaissance for us to remember as a people who we are and what the power is in that.”

American society stigmatizes Native Hawaiians as “fat and lazy,” and sometimes Native Hawaiians internalize these stereotypes about themselves, said Lau. But the last 30 years have seen a resurgence and reclamation of cultural heritage. She intends to use her technical architecture and planning skills with an indigenous lens to push the Honolulu community toward sustainability.

It wasn’t until she moved to Eugene that her experience of being a minority crystallized.

“Being here brought up a lot of doubt for me,” Lau said. “Doubt that I was capable to be here and to do this, doubt that I would be able to finish, doubt that I even was a valuable citizen.”

She felt it in everyday moments, like being ignored during a visit to the dentist. She was isolated as a woman of color in her academic department. On top of the stress of grad school, she was usually the only person of color in her classrooms. During discussions, other students talked over her, and she found her ideas dismissed and overlooked by faculty.

“It’s below the radar. And if you aren’t looking for it, and if you don’t have the language for it, you don’t really know it’s happening. But it is still happening to you,” Lau said. “So many of these little experiences — whether you know they’re happening or not — they are having an effect on you.”

Architecture and planning graduate student Ali Lau explains the importance of bringing culture to a community during her final presentation for the 2018 winter term. (Phillip Quinn/Emerald)

Once she found a way to articulate the problems she and her peers were facing, Lau took the fight for equity to the top of the School of Planning, Public Policy and Management. She met Rachel Mallinga, one of the only other women of color in the department, and the two began to work together.

“Ali is just one woman in the long history of women of color who’ve spoken up and done the hard work to push for change,” Mallinga, an alum of the nonprofit management program, said.

In 2015, Mallinga founded the Peer Exchange as a safe space for underrepresented students in PPPM to convene, share their experiences and support each other. Lau was inspired to voice her concerns about a lack of equity in the department and find a constructive way to create change from within.

After a group of students sent official letters to the PPPM department with requests for equity action and saw little change, Lau knew they needed a concrete framework to hold the department accountable.  The two women spent eight months interviewing students and compiling an official report that evaluated the department’s cultural competency from a student perspective and recommended specific changes to curriculums, classrooms and faculty.

“This ‘Cultural Competency Report’ provides key elements to establishing a culture of equity, diversity, and inclusion,” Mallinga and Lau wrote in its intro.

When Mallinga graduated last year, Lau took over as a facilitator of the Peer Exchange.

Because of Mallinga and Lau’s vocal leadership of the Peer Exchange and the official letters sent to the department head, Rich Margerum, the PPPM department formed an Equity Initiative of faculty and students to address the concerns.

“I think there’s a little bit of complacency that, oh, we’re all liberal-minded, open minded, and so forth, everything’s going fine — without really understanding where those perspectives are coming from,” Margerum said.

The initiative has used this report and hosted listening sessions to hear the perspectives of underrepresented students. For a graduate department that specializes in shaping cities and societies with policy, it’s essential to understand how applicable and integral these issues are and include them as a central part of the curriculum, according to Lau.

“You can count on your fingers how many students of color there are. You know that it’s small,” Lau said about PPPM.

Graduate school is already a stressful environment. Add the stress of being an underrepresented student and it becomes even worse, Lau said.

“When you’re one of a few women of color in a department, you’re dealing with a really different experience, and graduate school can be an unwelcoming environment” Mallinga said. “Just having that support — how to navigate around microaggressions is really important.”

Lau also sees Mallinga as a leader for social change. “Until I started working with her, one, I thought I was going crazy, and two, I just had no idea that you could actually do something about it,” Lau said.

Those around Lau in the department and in her life, like her partner and fellow PPPM student, Oliver Gaskell, consistently emphasized Lau’s ability as an agent for change on both structural and personal levels, despite all the other work she has to do.

Gaskell said that Lau also aims to connect with the international students in the graduate program who are sometimes left on their own. He said she made it one of her goals last term to meet with international students and hear about their experiences.

Margerum described her as brave for confronting implicit bias within classrooms and holding the department accountable.

“She’s just done a really terrific job of being critical of things that fall short but also being very constructive and presenting in a way that faculty come away with a real positive, energized feeling about what they need to do and being convinced this is a priority,” Margerum said about Lau’s work.

Lau and Mallinga aren’t the only students who’ve felt burdened by a culture of whiteness at UO.

“Eugene’s pretty ethnically homogeneous, so when you first move here you can feel really othered to a whole different extent than probably where you’re moving from,” Jaclyn Kellon, a Ph.D candidate in chemistry and the president and founder of student support group Community for Minorities in STEM, said.

Kellon reached out to Lau last summer when starting a program for grad students called Creating Connections. “Our goal is to create a larger social network and social support system that can help students from underrepresented minority populations connect and feel a sense of belonging at the university,” Kellon said.

Lau is in her last six of months of school and has moved her focus from the PPPM’s Equity Initiative to helping Kellon kickstart the broader program.

She wants to leave behind a growing community and support system for future graduate students of color.

PPPM hired two new tenure-track faculty, for positions called Engaging Diverse Communities. Both start next fall and are Latino men.

But the department still has a long way to go and things are moving slowly, according to Lau.

“People who are in positions of power, namely white, cisgendered men and women should listen to women of color,” Mallinga said. “Throughout history we’ve spoken our truths and this is what Ali has done. She’s going to be an agent of change.”

The post An agent of change: Grad student Ali Lau fights for equity and inclusion for underrepresented students in the College of Design appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on An agent of change: Grad student Ali Lau fights for equity and inclusion for underrepresented students in the College of Design

“Rolling the dice”: TFAB weighs tuition increases against enrollment, budget shortfall for 2019

After more than a month of deliberation, the University of Oregon’s Tuition and Fee Advisory Board has reached a reluctant consensus: they recommend a tuition increase of 2.84 percent for in-state students and 2.49 percent for out-of-state students during the 2018-19 academic year. 

That’s a $6 per-credit-hour increase for residents and an $18 increase for nonresidents — about $270 and $810 more per year, respectively. Tuition and fees currently total $11,571 for in-state and $34,611 for out-of-state. In the last ten years, resident tuition increased by 87.9 percent.

TFAB’s final recommendation will land on the desks of UO Provost Jayanth Banavar and President Michael Schill as early as Friday. Though Banavar and Schill will review TFAB’s analysis, it is up to Schill to make a final recommendation to the UO Board of Trustees. This should happen during the week of February 19. After that, the Board of Trustees will vote on the tuition proposals in March.

Student tuition funds the majority of UO’s educational operating costs, although roughly $5 million of tuition revenue goes towards the athletic department.

After last year’s 6 percent increase for in-state students and 3 percent increase for out-of-state students, TFAB administrative members hope to avoid spikes and keep yearly tuition increases small — but steady. Incremental increases are necessary to keep up with rising costs, said Jamie Moffitt, UO’s chief financial officer and TFAB member.

But TFAB’s tuition recommendation for 2018-19 leaves UO absorbing a $2 to $8 million budget shortfall, depending on next year’s enrollment numbers.

A difficult deliberation

Made up of 16 different administrators, deans, educators and student representatives, the tuition advisory board’s members expressed uneasiness with the budget shortfall throughout their final meeting on Wednesday. But as they examined possible higher tuition increases to cover more of the shortfall, they also worried about the enrollment deterrent-effect of large tuition hikes on out-of-state students.

“There is a big question, whatever percentages we’re targeting, how you split that between resident and nonresident,” said Moffitt. “In this case, the percentages are not far off but the dollar amounts are very different in terms of charges per credit hour.”

ASUO President Amy Schenk pushed for a smaller tuition hike for resident students and said she would prefer a $5 per credit hour increase rather than the $6 the group settled on.

“I realize with the [cost] projections we have here it’s unrealistic,” said Schenk. “It’s still such a large burden on residents.”

Just a $1 difference per credit hour has a big budget impact.

“It’s about $400,000, which is 4 people’s jobs,” said Shelton.

The group did not reach consensus on the Lundquist College of Business’ request to implement a differential tuition rate. The proposal would implement a $20 per credit hour increase for business classes and bring in an estimated $1.4 million to go towards hiring tenure faculty and improving student services. The business college’s 2016 accreditation report dinged the college for a low tenure-track faculty to student ratio.

Several TFAB members shared concerns over a lack of university policy around implementing differential tuition in colleges and expressed concerns that it could discourage students from taking business classes.  

“I’m torn because I see the accreditation issues and that’s concerning,” said Imani Dorsey, ASUO State Affairs Commissioner. “But I think it feels rushed. I think there needs to be a policy there. I’m concerned about the long-term financial aid aspect of it.”

Imani Dorsey (left) and ASUO President Amy Schenk at Wednesday’s Tuition and Fee Advisory Board meeting. (Emily Goodykoontz/Daily Emerald)

Tuition price hinges on enrollment — and vice-versa 

Administrators are banking on enrollment increases to keep the shortfall from hitting $8 million. And enticing new students — especially out of state — requires tuition rates that don’t stray far from the median rate of comparable universities.

“Where our pricing is versus competitors, on the nonresident side we are right at market,” said Moffitt.

Last year, a drop in enrollment walloped UO’s budget. Between fall 2016 and fall 2017, enrollment decreased by over 700 students — an $8 million dollar loss in tuition and fee revenue.

The same thing could happen next year if UO doesn’t see a return on its recruitment efforts.

“All scenarios are terrible if enrollment drops — and that’s why we’re out there recruiting really hard,” said Brad Shelton, executive vice provost for academic operations and TFAB member.

Administrators are optimistic about enrollment because they’ve seen a 23 percent increase in prospective student applications, Shelton said. According to him, at least 13 percent of that is due to recruitment.

“There are a whole bunch of positive indications that we should see actual growth next year,” said Moffitt.

Statewide enrollment in public higher education has dropped since 2012.

Moffitt said it’s best to err on the side of caution when considering enrollment, tuition price, and the budget gap. But TFAB members say they don’t want to see the whole gap covered by students and their families.

“My recommendation would be that if we have a gap, we tell the president we think there has to be a gap, and that [money] has to come from somewhere else,” said Moffitt.

But even if UO does see its most optimistic enrollment projections realized, there could still be a $2.8 million budget gap. It will be up to President Schill and the board to decide how to handle it.

Last spring, UO cut $4.5 million from its budget, resulting in faculty layoffs.

Despite cuts, costs are rising. Each year the university must pay more in incremental faculty and staff salary increases and retirement costs.

The campus expansion plan is part of an effort to mitigate spiking public education retirement costs, or PERS. These costs are expected to rise every other year for the next eight years, burdening UO’s budget with an estimated 7.1 million each time.

PERS are volatile, meaning they could rise further than the projected 7.1 million, leaving UO with an even larger budget hole to fill.  

“We’re rolling the dice,” said Shelton.

There will be a period for public comment on next year’s tuition between Feb. 12 and 17, during which UO Provost Jayanth Banavar will host a tuition forum for students.

The post “Rolling the dice”: TFAB weighs tuition increases against enrollment, budget shortfall for 2019 appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on “Rolling the dice”: TFAB weighs tuition increases against enrollment, budget shortfall for 2019

The Emerald wants to celebrate outstanding women at UO. Find out how you can nominate someone here.

Do you know a woman making a positive impact in the University of Oregon community? Chances are, you probably do — and chances are, she probably doesn’t get enough recognition. The Emerald is looking for local women to honor as part of Women’s History Month in March. Our newsroom will choose one woman from the pool of nominees and feature her story on the cover of our weekly newspaper. We want to hear from the community about the amazing women who are out there every day, making a difference at UO with their integrity, courage, innovation, creativity, spirit, smarts, leadership, hard work and ambition. Help us honor the women of UO!

Fill out a nomination form here. 

Criteria:

She identifies as a woman.

She should be be an undergraduate or graduate student, staff member, faculty or UO-affiliated community member (e.g. SafeRide driver, janitor, alumnus).

She should be a leader in her community who is actively making positive contributions to the UO and Oregon at large.

Her actions should demonstrate integrity, courage, or innovation.

She should be innovative or pushing barriers and stereotypes surrounding gender and/or race.

A leader in her field of work, volunteer work or area study; making waves with a positive, tangible impact.

She must be willing to participate in her nomination.

The person who is doing the nomination must obtain permission to nominate the woman and include contact info for both parties.

Examples of nominees (but not limited to):

A scientist or grad student doing exemplary research.

A student on campus working tirelessly for social justice.

A woman taking part in community action or doing hands-on community work, such as organizing education opportunities for local children or organizing food drives for local food banks.

Process:

Anyone making a nomination should fill out our form here. The Emerald’s management team and desk editors will review the nominations and hold a vote on February 18th to pick which woman’s story we will feature. A reporter will interview the honoree the following week and set up a time to photograph her before March 3.

The post The Emerald wants to celebrate outstanding women at UO. Find out how you can nominate someone here. appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on The Emerald wants to celebrate outstanding women at UO. Find out how you can nominate someone here.

Differential tuition in Lundquist College: Who should foot the bill?

The Lundquist College of Business needs a financial boost, and it could be coming straight out of business students’ pockets.

The college has proposed a “differential tuition” for its classes — meaning students who take courses offered by Lundquist College will be charged $20 more per credit hour, on top of regular tuition. That amounts to an extra $720 per year for majors taking 36 business credits.

Until now, the business school’s extra services and faculty costs have been spread throughout the undergraduate population’s tuition rate — but it hasn’t been enough.

Proponents of the Lundquist College proposal say the tuition increase is necessary to meet accreditation and competitor standards and will ultimately benefit business students. A 2016 review from the college’s accrediting body revealed only 48 tenure faculty for its 5,000 students — “much too low” for a research-oriented business college.

Dean Sarah Nutter said the college will bolster its faculty and its student services with the estimated $1.4 million revenue boost.

“We have some gaps — and they’re pretty big gaps,” said Nutter.

According to the proposal, there’s a ratio of 799 students to just one career services staffer in the college. Nutter said business students expect top-notch career advising, tutoring and internship opportunities — and to keep the college competitive among similar universities, UO has to bridge the gaps.

ASUO President Amy Schenk. (Christopher Trotchie/Emerald)

But some members of the Tuition and Fee Advisory Board raised questions and concerns about the proposal’s larger implications for UO at their meeting on Jan. 12.

“I just have a lot of concerns when it comes to making students pay more money when it comes to a service that is already offered,” said ASUO President Amy Schenk.

She sits on TFAB, a group of 16 different administrators, deans, educators and student representatives who make an annual tuition rate recommendation to UO Provost Jayanth Banavar and President Michael Schill.

Schenk also attends the expensive Clark Honors College. “Without scholarships, I would not be able to be there at all,” she said.

It’s the only other college at UO using a differential tuition for undergraduates. It charges students an additional $4,000 per year.

At the meeting, Schenk said a differential tuition at Lundquist could discourage potential business students from exploring the major by taking a business class.

“What sets our university apart is that accessibility to all the different schools,” said Schenk.

She also worries the tuition increase could reduce the number of low-income students in Lundquist College.

“The honors college has a huge problem with diversity, and I don’t want more students priced out — specifically students of color — priced out of the business school with a differential increase,” said Schenk.

With the Lundquist College of Business’s differential tuition proposal, resident business students would see a 7.4 percent increase and nonresidents a 2. 5 percent rise in tuition.

The proposal includes a small financial buffer for current students — 10 percent of the extra revenue will be set aside during the first year to help continuing students with financial need. In 2020, 5 percent will be held for low-income students. After that, new and continuing students will pay the full price. PathwayOregon students, whose tuition is already covered by the scholarship, will not be affected.

This is not the first time UO has seen a differential tuition proposal from a college — it was deliberated in a university-wide discussion eight years ago.

Brad Shelton, executive vice provost for academic operations, said the discussion culminated in a meeting with former UO President Richard Lariviere and most of UO’s academic and administrative leadership.

“One of the things that seemed to be important to a lot of people was the idea that we try to be a university where we basically treated everybody the same way, and we didn’t put students into a position where they were choosing their major based on cost,” said Shelton.

Lariviere nixed the differential tuition then, but Shelton said he may have just been kicking the can down the road.

“It was us swimming against the tide, because most universities do have differential tuition. Where you usually see it is in two programs — business and engineering,” said Shelton.

Oregon State University has a similar differential for its business school at $20 per credit hour.

This is the second iteration of the school’s differential tuition proposal — one was introduced last year, as a block charge to all business majors. Administrators consulted with some leaders of business college-affiliated student groups and made changes.

“There was a strong sense from the students that a per-credit approach was much more fair,” said Nutter.

Nutter says differential tuition is a necessary change for the future of the college.

“How do we create an environment where students succeed? And not only that they can succeed — but that they’re career ready when they leave?” said Nutter. “That’s absolutely essential for business school students.”

Most of the college’s budget — 90 percent — goes towards faculty, staff and student services. At $226,700, an average professor’s salary at Lundquist College is more than twice what many UO professors in other fields of study make. Shelton said it’s the market value of business school tenure positions and is necessary to attract talent.

Christoph Lindner, dean of the College of Design, vocalized support for the proposal at the TFAB meeting but called for a larger community discussion or committee to review the long-term implications of differential tuition.

“It is opening this philosophical question,” Lindner said. “How far do we take the principle of differential tuition, and are we going to do it case by case as each [college] maybe feels confident enough, or desperate enough to have to propose this? Or do we have some principles guiding this conversation as we move forward?”

The post Differential tuition in Lundquist College: Who should foot the bill? appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on Differential tuition in Lundquist College: Who should foot the bill?

Resident tuition rose by 87 percent in ten years: What’s in store for next year’s tuition?

Remember last winter term when the University of Oregon’s Board of Trustees approved a whopping 10.6 percent tuition increase?  And then, when lawmakers ponied up extra funds, it reduced UO’s total increase to 6.56 percent? Heads up, because it’s time for UO to balance its coffers again — setting next year’s tuition rate.

There’s little chance that tuition will remain flat. That hasn’t happened since 2001.

Total resident tuition and fees have risen by 87.6 percent in the last ten years. At the same time, UO’s state funding dropped, hitting a low in 2012. Since then it’s increased some each year, but hasn’t fully recovered. Funding for UO is still around over $13 million less than in 2008, according to funding records.

Meanwhile, university expenses have piled on each year, including personnel and retirement “cost drivers.”

Next year, UO must digest an estimated $16.7 million cost increase. That’s a lot less compared to this year’s $25 million that caused the 6.5 percent tuition uptick. While cost increases fluctuate year-to-year, the increases are recurring, and the university has to plan ahead. UO administrators are expecting a $20.5 million annual cost hike in the next eight years — and that’s a conservative estimate, says UO’s Chief Financial Officer Jamie Moffitt.  

Moffitt said the cost drivers have gone up dramatically — last year retirement costs went up about 18 percent.  

An outsider might look at the university and see an institution ripe with cash. From new buildings to a brimming athletics department, UO is expanding its assets. Tuition Fee and Advisory Board member and professor Chris Murray said it’s a question that comes up often.

“Everyone thinks we’re rich, and I’m running around at dinner parties saying we get nothing,” he said at Friday’s TFAB meeting.

UO’s Tuition and Fees Advisory board — made up of 16 different administrators, deans, educators and student representatives — will spend the next month discussing and hearing tuition proposals. At the beginning of February, they’ll send a recommendation to UO Provost Jayanth Banavar and President Michael Schill.

About a month later, after allowing time for public comment and the provost to examine the numbers, Schill will present the Board of Trustees with his request. The board will then vote on next year’s tuition rates in March. If the rate increase exceeds 5 percent, the proposal will be sent to a state committee for review — the Higher Education Coordinating Committee.

In total, the university has about a $1 billion budget to work with.

“That’s a billion dollars of revenue and a billion dollars of expenses,” said Moffitt. “So even though it’s large, that doesn’t necessarily mean that there’s a lot of wiggle room.”

Let’s take a look at the numbers

.

So what’s in a budget? Students are paying for most of it.

Each year the budgeting process is roughly the same. An intricate series of number-crunching cost projections and tuition simulations run through the business office and land in the laps of UO’s TFAB members.

UO actually has two separate budgets. Administration says these two streams of funding and revenue are separate — and cannot be crossed. Each budget is around half of the university’s billion-dollar pie. One of those budgets will have to absorb the $16 million cost increase — and that’s the half funded mostly by tuition.

This separate “fund accounting” budgeting method has confused a lot of people. Some ASUO leaders, students and even faculty are asking for alternative solutions to the ever-growing budget issue, and want to know why the streams cannot be crossed.

The fund that’s covered mostly by tuition is the Education and General fund, or ENG. It covers basic university operations — school, college and administration budgets, debts and operational costs. It’s the fund TFAB is most concerned with — the half that must absorb the cost increase.

The other fund includes federal grants and contracts, restricted donor gifts (like the $500 million to build the Knight Campus) and auxiliary revenue streams such as housing, athletics and the EMU.

Auxiliaries like UO Athletics are supposed to be financially self-sufficient. The university charges them a small amount of overhead for using services like the human resources department, and this small amount of money makes it back into the ENG stream.

This fund’s donor gifts, such as scholarships, are given out through a separate nonprofit entity, UO Foundations, which manages and invests UO’s endowments. Currently, most of its financial records are no longer available to the public.

Almost all of this fund’s spending is restricted, whether it be legally or practically, said Moffitt.

Money comes in for a particular purpose and it’s spent on that purpose,” she said.

Conversely, the ENG fund depends on tuition — and the tuition rate depends largely on UO’s operating and personnel costs, and how much funding the state decides to shell out each year. In 2017, tuition revenue made up over 80 percent of the total funds in this pot — student dollars are funding the majority of the educational costs.  State funding was at 13.9 percent.

So what, exactly, is driving up tuition costs?

Cost drivers: It comes down to PERS

UO’s educational cost is 80 percent people — that means classified and unclassified faculty, staff, graduate employees and everything that comes with them — salaries, retirement and health insurance. These costs are recurring — and each year they increase by millions. They are what make up the $16.7 million cost increase in next year’s budget.

Retirement costs are a large chunk of this, and they’re the fastest growing. Every other year the university must pay into the Public Education Retirement System (PERS). This grows by an estimated extra $7.1 million every other year. This cost hit last year, explaining why this year’s cost increase is smaller. This cost is more volatile than others and will likely grow beyond the estimate, and it will keep piling on for at least the next 8 years, said Moffitt.

To run tuition projections, Moffitt estimates that annual cost drivers will pile on an annual $20.5 million each year.

What can the university do?

“It’s a really hard topic because none of us want to raise tuition,” said Moffitt. “I’m now going into my seventh year doing this, and it’s just incredibly challenging.”

Moffitt, ASUO leaders and other members of TFAB are searching for ways to avoid huge tuition increases in the face of an ever-growing, dire financial situation. Several options were brought up at the recent TFAB meeting. Here’s what was discussed:

  • Expanding the campus — Moffitt says this is the most viable option. More students equals more tuition dollars, and administrators are considering expanding campus by 3,000 students over the next 8 years to help cover the PERS costs. Their projection includes a 3 percent increase in tuition each year. This eventually requires a new dorm, new teaching building and faculty — but the university hopes to avoid these investments in the first several years. ASUO leaders expressed reservations with this as the only solution.
  • Cutting budgets — The university has already done this. It cut $4.5  million from the 2018 budget — meaning staff and faculty — and it may seek more cuts.
  • Lowering salaries — This was brought up by ASUO leaders and a faculty member at the TFAB meeting. Moffitt said renegotiating union wages is not something the university is considering.
  • Dipping into the other fund — ASUO President Amy Schenk wants to see this option explored, rather than cutting jobs or raising tuition. Though administration says each budget much remain more or less separate, proposals have been brought before the advisory board in past.
  • More state funding — ASUO leaders said they will lobby for increased state funding.

These points and more will be up for discussion on Tuesday, Jan. 16, at the Tuition and Fees Advisory Board’s student forum. The roundtable meeting, aimed at discussing tuition and the school’s budget, is at 5 p.m. in the EMU Ballroom. Check back at dailyemerald.com for coverage of the forum.

Meanwhile, university leaders are assessing their options.

“I wish we weren’t facing cost increases every year, and the cost increases we’re facing mean that we have to make unbelievably tough decisions,” Moffit said. “Sometimes those are decisions to raise tuition more than we like, and sometimes those are decisions to make cuts that end up impacting people’s jobs and their lives — there are no easy answers.”

The post Resident tuition rose by 87 percent in ten years: What’s in store for next year’s tuition? appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on Resident tuition rose by 87 percent in ten years: What’s in store for next year’s tuition?

Tuition tax: UO graduate students, university fight back on tax reform that raises student costs by $65 billion over 10 years

Considering graduate school? You might need to think twice. University of Oregon graduate students may soon see their taxes doubled — and some grad students fear they won’t be able to afford finishing their degrees.

A GOP-led federal tax reform bill, H.R. 1, passed in the House on Nov. 16, by a partisan vote. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act strips grad students — and undergraduates — of several tax benefits. Nationwide, some graduate students could see their taxes triple if the Senate and House come to an agreement on tax reform in the next few weeks.

The House bill increases college costs by repealing the student loan interest deduction and eliminating two tax credits that both students and their parents benefit from. It implements taxes on employer-provided tuition assistance and tuition waivers that allow parents employed by universities to send their children to college. H.R. 1 even limits the ways in which parents can save for college. And universities depending on millions of dollars in donations each year could see those gifts shrink — fewer donors will itemize their taxes, and will lose the incentive to give.

Both UO and its graduate students are clamoring for changes to a bill that could increase costs to college students nationwide by about $65 billion over the next 10 years — and they aren’t alone in their outrage.

The American Council on Education and some 50-odd higher education groups (including the Association of American Universities, of which UO is a member), signed a letter to the House Ways and Means Committee, decrying the legislation for discouraging postsecondary education and undermining the financial stability of educational institutions.

The letter cited eight sections of the House bill that higher education groups call detrimental. The sections eliminate deductions and raise the taxes of both undergraduate and graduate students while significantly reducing the revenue of universities.

“It is already a struggle for me to survive on the stipend provided to me,” Julia Taylor, a UO Ph.D. candidate two years into her studies said. “If this tax bill goes through the Senate, I honestly don’t know what I am going to do.”

A Senate version of H.R. 1 passed out of the Finance Committee Nov. 16, and could make its way to the Senate floor as early as next Wednesday, says Nancy O’Neall, monitor of the Ad Hoc Tax Group, an informal collective of university and higher education associations that tracks federal tax policy and its effect on higher education.

But the Senate version retains key differences that must be reconciled with the House version of the bill before any legislation becomes law, and it is unclear exactly what effects the final legislation would have on educational institutions and college students. Many at UO are expecting a large, negative impact.

“If our revenues are disrupted we have to find ways to balance that,” Betsy Boyd, federal liaison for UO said. “We have a commitment at this university to the student experience and keeping college affordable and this bill will make it harder for us to do those things.”

The House bill repeals two tax credits for students and their families, the American Opportunity and the Lifetime Learning tax credits. It also eliminates deductions for student loan interest — increasing the cost of student loans by about $13 billion over the next ten years, according to the American Council on Education.

“About half of our student body population has to borrow money to go to school,” Boyd said, “and when you are just starting out in a career, being able to deduct that interest helps manage the cost of borrowing.”

But graduate students might stand to lose the most.

The House version of H.R. 1 repeals a traditional tax exclusion on tuition waivers received by graduate students around the country — including the 1,400 graduate employees at UO. Tuition waivers are usually about $5,000 per term, and graduate employees also receive a stipend for living costs, according to Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Sara Hodges. Eliminating the tax exclusion would more than double the tax on UO graduate stipends — amounts already difficult to live on, grad students say.

Calling graduate employees a “life-force” on the campus, Hodges expressed her concern in a letter to Oregon representatives Sen. Ron Wyden, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Finance, and Rep. Earl Blumenauer, who sits on the House Ways and Means Committee — the two committees responsible for drafting the legislation.

“This legislation is bad for graduate students, bad for the undergraduates who are instructed by graduate students, and bad for research labs that are powered by graduate student workers. It is bad for America’s ability to attract the brightest minds to its universities, and for America’s stature as a world leader in research and higher education,” Hodges wrote.

UO grad student Julia Taylor calls senators in opposition to the new tax reform plan on Nov. 21, 2017. (Sarah Northrop/Emerald) (Sarah Northrop/Emerald)

But UO grad students aren’t taking the legislation sitting down. While other students prepared to head home for the holiday, some grad students organized a phone banking day — their only recourse to countering the legislation so far.

On Tuesday, Nov. 21, graduate student members of the university-wide Graduate Teaching Fellow Federation gathered in PLC 180 to call senators representing communities around the nation and asked them to vote down the tax reform bill. They also asked family, friends, educators and community members to call their legislative representatives on  behalf of graduate students.

For some, a tax on tuition waivers could mean a swift end to their academic careers.

After more than three years of working towards her Ph.D., Graduate Employee Larissa Petrucci worries she will have to quit graduate school.

“If the University of Oregon could not find a way to keep me from paying that increased tax, it would not be tenable for me to continue grad school,” Petrucci, who organized the phone banking said.

While it’s unclear how UO would manage the increased costs, the university will advocate for its students, Boyd said.

“What we do know is that if we tax graduate student tuition or we reduce the tax credit that helps put money back in student pockets, college is going to be less affordable,” Boyd said.

UO grad student Robert Moore writes about his income. UO grad students call and write letters to their senators in opposition of the new tax-reform plan on Nov. 21, 2017. (Sarah Northrop/Emerald)

The university could see impacts to both its revenue and donations, Boyd said. Last year, UO received 50,000 donations from 40,551 donors for a total of $695 million. Annual donations average around $200 million, and last year UO received a single $500 million gift from the Knight family that will be used to build a new research center, the Phil and Penny Knight Campus.

For the most part, UO relies on small, yearly donations.

“We have a lot of people who make small gifts that make a big difference to the university,” Boyd said. “This bill is expected to greatly reduce charitable giving.”

The tax reform means about 94 percent of taxpayers would not itemize their taxes, and not receive any deduction for charitable giving. That, in turn, would significantly lower the amount of people donating to nonprofit organizations and universities like UO, Boyd said.

The university expects to take a big revenue hit, losing federal tax subsidies on bonds, and universities everywhere would lose access to private activity and advance refunding bonds. UO uses these low-interest bonds for capital projects like building construction, including the Ford Alumni Center and Global Scholars Hall, said Boyd. Sequestration on Build America Bonds alone would cost UO about $20 million between 2018 and 2040 — about $1 million per year, said Boyd. And changes to the unrelated business income tax (UBIT) would tax nonprofits for licensing trademarks and logos — taking a chunk of UO’s $4 million annual revenue, money that otherwise goes to the athletic department.

For now, the tax reform hovers in the Senate, waiting for a vote.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell needs 50 Republican votes to pass the Senate version of the bill and could bring it to the floor next week, according to Nancy O’Neall, monitor of Ad Hoc Tax Group.

But action on the Senate floor might be delayed if McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan think they can negotiate a deal between the House and the Senate in the next few weeks.

“If so — and that’s a big ‘if’ — McConnell would amend the Senate Finance bill on the floor with the pre-cooked deal, the Senate would pass it and send it to the House for their approval,” O’Neall wrote in an email to Ad Hoc Tax members. “This would obviate the need for a House/Senate conference committee and speed the bill to the President’s desk before Christmas.”

What, exactly, the final bill will contain depends on the current negotiations between GOP senators and the House.

UO grad student Larissa Petrucci writes Senate contact info on the chalkboard in PLC 180. UO grad students call and write letters to their senators in opposition of the new tax reform bill on Nov. 21, 2017. (Sarah Northrop/Emerald)

“The end game is critical,” Boyd said. “You can assume that House and Senate Republican leadership are coordinating.”

For now, grad students and universities await a fate resting in the hands of the GOP senators.

“From a university perspective, what we care most about are the impacts to students — changes that result in tuition being taxed, making college less affordable or creating new costs that disrupt our ability to meet our mission,” Boyd said. “There are a lot of bad things in this bill.”

The post Tuition tax: UO graduate students, university fight back on tax reform that raises student costs by $65 billion over 10 years appeared first on Emerald Media.

Posted in UncategorizedComments Off on Tuition tax: UO graduate students, university fight back on tax reform that raises student costs by $65 billion over 10 years